As a result of 2008 credit crisis, interest rate OTC (over the counter) derivative
markets have shifted from LIBOR discounting to OIS (Over night Index Swap) discounting due to increased
use of collateralized transactions. The market players have realized that LIBOR
rates can no longer be considered risk free yield curve due to embedded credit
and liquidity risk. Collateral generally earns overnight cash rate relevant for
its currency. Corresponding term cash rates are Overnight Index Swaps (OIS)
rates.
Spread between USD LIBOR and USD OIS has been very
stable around 5-7 bps historically thereby justifying use Libor Curve for
discounting cash flows. This worked until September 2007 when the initial blow
ups due to US subprime crisis started surfacing and spread between Libor and
OIS spiked higher and reaching peak of 350 bps at the time of Lehman
bankruptcy. At this time market players have recognized that LIBOR no longer
can be a workable proxy for risk free yield curve. Because LIBOR curve has bank
credit and liquidity risk priced into it and vindicated by sky high LIBOR-OIS
spreads. Consequently OIS rate became the risk free rate and hence a candidate
for discounting cash flows, hence the name OIS discounting or CSA (Credit Support
Annexes) Discounting.
Borrowing (funding) costs
Market cost of borrowing typically depend on borrowing terms including, term life, secured or unsecured and credit worthiness of the borrower. Firm’s borrow cheaply at OIS (over night index Swap rate) rate where funds are collateralized with cash. Alternatively firms raise funds pledging securities like US Treasury notes instead of cash as collateral at Repo rates in Repo markets. Therefore borrowing at Repo rate represents cost of funds for collateralized borrowing and higher than the OIS rate. Firms also raise funds that are not collateralized by lien to any specific assets at much higher rates. This type of uncollateralized funding is driven by factors like borrower’s credit risk. CDS (credit default swap rates) and Cash bond spreads provides reasonable estimate for this type of cost of funding and will be typically much higher than the repo rate and the OIS rate. Typically CDS rates are lower than Bond yields in the near term. As the term to maturity increases we see Bond yields lower than CDS market levels
Many OTC derivative transactions follow CSA (credit support
Annexes). These CSA’s terms will govern the underlying collateral to be posted.
Sometimes, collateral posted in same currency as the underlying transaction cash
flow currency leading to single currency CSA discounting and other times,
collateral currency is different from the Transaction currency resulting in
multi currency CSA discounting.
Single
Currency CSA Discounting:
Single Currency CSA discounting is same as OIS discounting. In this
case CSA collateral to be posted in a currency is same as the currency of the
transaction’s cash flows and discounted using transaction (or collateral)
currency OIS rate. OIS rate is readily available from market observed OIS
rates.
Multi currency
CSA Discounting:
In the case of Multi currency
CSA collateral to posted in a currency other than the currency of the
transaction’s cash flows. Then Cash flows are discounted at the OIS rate
(Collateral currency) and adjusted by cross currency FX basis between
collateral currency OIS Rate and transaction currency OIS rate. Although OIS
rates are readily observable in the market but not OIS implied FX basis
spreads. At the same time there are active market quotes for LIBOR cross
currency swaps are available. Under arbitrage free framework, FX basis spreads
implied from LIBOR cross currency swaps should be same as implied from
imaginary OIS based cross currency swaps. Using these cross currency basis swaps along with the collateral
currency OIS rate we can perform CSA based discounting in multi currency
framework.
CSA discounting is applied to Interest Rate derivative products. This include, IR swaps, Swaptions, Caps&Floors and CMS products.
Thank you for your helpful articles. I have a question in regards to OIS discounting. While for LIBOR, 1D-3M rates are used, the FED publishes only the 1D OIS rate. What would you use for the 2D-3M rates in the curve?
ReplyDeleteFed Publishes every day Federal funds (interbank borrowing rate) effective rate. At the same time there are two type instruments are actively traded in the market. First one trades term fed funds that is 3M fed funds, 5m fed funds etc upto 10y (market is liquid upto 3y) in the OIS (overnight index swap) market. Second one, Fed funds vs 3 M libor basis swaps trading upto 30 years. using these two instruments we can construct OIS Yield curve. All you have to know here is day count conventions for these two products. Rest of the exercise is simple mathematics. Hope this helps.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for your help. I will look into these instruments. I guess they are published on the SDR / SEF data for USD?
ReplyDeleteAlso, some more thoughts. Using 3-month FF CME OIS futures and the rates provided by the SEF for the OIS maturities up to 30y, that should be sufficient for building an OIS curve using market data using publicly available data?
ReplyDeleteAnne winter,
ReplyDeleteyou are right you can use SDR/SEF data.
With respect to second question,use OIS swap rates and FF/Libor Basis swaps.
OIS rates and FF/Libor basis swaps data you will get on the SDR.
My only caution is this needs some data cleaning. Second, not all instruments trade on any given day.